You are here: Home > Blog > 2009 was the year that wasn't

Something on your mind

2009 was the year that wasn't

Submitted by Stephen Kinsella on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 | Category: Investments

Stephen Kinsella

We expected to get past our difficulties in 2009. Instead, our economy's difficulties multiplied. Forecasts for Gross Domestic Product in January 2009 were for -2.5%. By December 2009, forecasts put the drop at somewhere between -7.5% and -9% of inflation-adjusted national output. Our unemployment levels have soared, along with our national debt.

The economy is in a deflation - a drop in the general price level for goods and services. Deflation is a bad thing when the ratio of household debt to disposable income is something like 176%, because deflation makes the cost of debt repayment higher.

Nationally, the need for fiscal contraction has been accepted by the body public. Ireland's citizens have braced themselves for the pain Minister Lenihan's December budget will inflict on their pay packets in January. Efforts to reduce the scale of that fiscal contraction by unions were staunchly resisted, partly because of the widespread acceptance that the route to recovery will come from cuts in expenditure and a widening of the tax base in 2010 and 2011.

What did we achieve this year?

When the video boffins at RTE decide to do a 'Reeling in the Years' of 2009, what highlights will they pick?
Did we get past any of the difficulties that beset us as a nation in December 2008?
Any review of 2008 would include the collapse in world credit markets, the bailouts and nationalisations of banks all over the World, the unfolding of the construction bubble in Ireland and a sure sign that Irish banks' toxic loans must be dealt with in some way to ensure a functioning and stable economy.

In 2009, the debate began in earnest on what to do to clear out the banks' toxic debts in order to free up credit to the 'real economy' that's Pat the Plumber who needs a €20,000 overdraft one month to pay wages and costs, who gets the overdraft at a good rate of interest if the banks are working well or doesn't if the banks lending activities are stalled due to the presence of 'toxic' debts. Overall, the high (or low) lights of 2009 were:

  1. Ireland's banking crisis was recognised and dealt with, in part, by setting up NAMA 

  2. A start was made to resolve Ireland's fiscal crisis with the April emergency budget and December's budget 

  3. Lisbon was passed 

  4. No effort was made to reduce unemployment, which increased by nearly 200,000 in 2009. 

  5. The fiscal crisis facing the state unfolded properly in 2009

In January, debates raged on what to do with the banks and their liabilities now guaranteed by the Irish taxpayer. Dell made moves to leave Ireland with the loss of some 1,900 jobs. Waterford Wedgwood was in the news in January, because its workers would not seemingly get their pension entitlements.

In February the scale of the banking crisis became apparent. Arguments over how to regain Ireland's `competitiveness' kicked off.

March saw CSO figures showing government tax revenues were way down from their expected levels, showing the economy was contracting at a very fast rate. The scale of the 2009 budget miscalculation was now clear, Ireland would be spending at 2009 levels, but taking in taxes at 2007 or 2006 levels and our national borrowing would have to increase to cover the shortfall. A certain `deficit fetishism' crept into Irish political and economic discourse as a result. Every man, woman and child seemed upset that Ireland was borrowing €400m, then €450m, and then €500m a week to fund the daily activities of the State. Unemployment offices became part of weekly life for thousands of Irish citizens and their claims on the exchequer drove national spending higher again.

In April a supplementary budget tried to get the nation's finances on track again, cutting expenditure slightly and increasing taxes, especially on public sector workers. An IMF report harshly criticised the government's management of the public finances during the boom years.

In May we learned that our banks would require more cash injections. The row over 'long term economic value' and 'market value' for banks toxic assets began. It continues to this day. Many economists, including myself, were publicly concerned over the type of asset management vehicle being used to help our economy recover.

In June an Innovation task force was appointed. It spent most of 2009 arguing within itself, and has yet to produce a single piece of worthwhile advice for the government. We also discovered that compared with the corresponding quarter of 2008, GDP at constant prices was 8.5% lower in the first 3 months of 2009.

July and August were unquestionably NAMA months. The debates around it raged throughout the country and brought the Irish Economy website to national prominence. Irisheconomy.ie is now the premier space for economic commentary in Ireland and regularly influences the news cycles around economic events.

September saw the full details of NAMA revealed. A relatively small haircut would be applied with little changes to the draft document circulated in the summer, despite rivers of ink being spilled on the issue.

October's big story was the Lisbon Treaty, which we passed through, fear mongering (as I wrote at the time) rather than economic or political arguments.

November and December saw the nation setting its collective jaw against the cuts we were assured would come in the budget. And these cuts did come. Tax increases were largely absent, but a €4bn package of cuts was secured - not without great political cost. Electoral immolation now seems unavoidable for Fianna Fail and their Green partners. Flooding all over the country exposed the inadequacy of the Irish government's response to crises, as well as our need for flood protection infrastructure in the coming years.

Star Star

Two political stars moved in opposite directions in 2009. Mary Coughlan's credibility as second in command of the country and Minister for Enterprise, Trade, and Employment was severly dented by a sequence of gaffes, beginning with her non attendance at the announcement of Dell's closure and ending with a farcical display of ignorance around who exactly Einstein and Darwin were and what they did. Her tenure as Tánaiste has been a further weight for the Taoiseach to bear. In contrast, Brian Lenihan, whose picture could easily have been put beside the dictionary definition of the term 'at sea' in late 2008, came into his own as Minister for Finance, as he got to grips with a huge ministerial brief during a time of unprecedented challenge and change.

Forging Ahead

Even with all that in mind there are many reasons to be positive as we move into 2010. The standard of living may have fallen back to 2003 levels, but these are still some of the highest in the world and represent a huge increase in living standards over, say, 1990,  when Ireland was already a very wealthy country in a global context.

Even if the worst predictions for 2010 come true, there will still be 85% more people employed in 2010 than there were in 1990 - a huge increase seen in its historical context.

The big challenges Ireland will face in 2010 will be the reform of Ireland's banking systems and their corporate governance, which will take place after an inquiry into risk management and governance mistakes made by the banks in the recent past. The Governer of the Central Bank, Dr. Honohan, has recently called on the government to take this first step. Ireland's return to growth will be slow and sluggish and sadly, we won't see positive GDP growth of any significance in 2010.

Reform and redeployment of Ireland's public service will most likely be stalled by low to mid-level industrial actions throughout the year, but at some point Ireland's public service will have to be reformed along more modern lines. It is better that we begin now. Internationally, the big story of 2009 was China’s aggressive stimulus package, which helped change the direction of the World economy. The big story of 2010 should be the broadening out of the global recovery. This should benefit both exports and domestic demand in Ireland, providing a supportive backdrop for markets.

Key issues that I see mattering to the International economy are:

  1. Unpegging the renminbi: What will happen to Ireland's influence if the currency of the People's Republic of China begins to float?

  2. Japan’s macro policy and economic recovery 

  3. Rising inflation in China and rising inflation in India 

  4. Rising asset prices driven by capital flows, low global rates and excess liquidity

The politics of climate change will take centre stage as the implications of the failure or success of the Copenhagen agreement play themselves out. The BRIC countries will continue their redefinition of global economics and politics in 2010, while the US, and most of the EU return from recession and depression to sluggish growth.

The possibility of a 'two speed' EU is quite likely with larger core economies forging ahead, while peripheral countries like Ireland and Latvia lag behind. In Ireland, however, the vast majority of people are still in employment, and have experienced a fall in the cost of living and hence a significant rise in living standards.

Overall I'm hopeful for 2010 and deeply happy to be past 2009 even if we are not quite past the problems we created for ourselves during the boom years.

Stephen

Add comment   Trackbacks (0)  Trackback url   Permalink
Bookmark on AddThis.com


5 Comments

Comment by siobhán on 05-01-2010 09:27 | Quote


Hi Steve, really 2009 the year that wasn't: does not make any sense, even if your trying to be glib, it's a waste of words, a waste of inanity. Did you hear of eternal recurrence? Check it out. And please leave the binary systems to the stars. Mary and Brian are distant dwarfs. Cheers, Siobhán

Comment by Pat on 06-01-2010 01:46 | Quote


Investing in the Irish economy will be a waste of time for the next few years, deflation is good for the economy it will allow the government to reduce spending which is the most important issue. Taxation will not increase significantly in Ireland for years to come so its all about spending.
Investors will be forced to invest in other economies which will be good for Rabo as it is one of the only vechicles.
Pat

Comment by Stephen Kinsella on 10-01-2010 03:13 | Quote


@Siobhán,
Sorry you don't like the title, but as an economist it would be inefficient of me to waste inanity!

@ Pat,

Deflation is indeed a feature of the Irish economy at the moment (and, I believe, for the next 2-3 years), but I don't think deflation will be a good thing for most people in Ireland.

One reason a prolonged deflation might be considered a macroeconomic disaster is because deflation increases the real value of debt. With a deflation of 7%, say, a 1 year loan of 100 Euros today will cost 107 Euros when it is repaid, plus whatever interest is levied on the principal. Loans of longer duration are of course subject to compounding. Deflation decreases the purchasing power of the debtor at a time when the economy requires increased levels of consumption and investment, which deepens the downturn, and exacerbates the crisis. The two Depressions of the last one and a half centuries–the 1890s and the 1930s–had substantial deflations. Prices fell at up to 15 percent per annum in the 1890s. Prices fell over 10 percent per annum for two years during the Great Depression. That meant that even a low nominal rate of interest become a much larger real interest rate, forcing a contraction in economic activity. Real interest rates in Ireland are around 9-10% for a business loan.

On the credit side, deflation increases the value of creditors' assets. However, with a potentially large percentage of Irish firms and households over-indebted--unable to service their debts and meet recurring expenses--the likelihood of large scale default (and consequent bad debt write down by public and private banks) outweighs the potential increase in creditors' funds from the deflation. Within a debt-deflation, the potential exists for system-wide financial distress and consequent instability. At the firm level, if a firm buys assets with borrowed money, then under extreme market conditions it may owe more money than it has, and with reduced cash flow, its expectation of paying off its loans goes down, and the firm defaults. If this happens on a sufficiently wide scale, then it can severely stress creditors and cause them to fail as well. The same story holds for households and, of course, for banks.


Comment by Pat on 19-01-2010 12:19 | Quote


Thanks for your explanation. On the subject of debt I feel borrowers are always trouble, indeed debt is a major problem in Ireland, Government, company and personal. How can a population of 4.5 million people service such a debt, 120 billion national debt. I think we are heading for the rocks, our only hope is that the ECB will come down hard on us and force us to cut borrowing drastically. I would like to know how much you think interest rates will be by Dec 2010 and how much property will fall by then.
I am learning German just in case it all goes horribly wrong. Pat

Comment by Deco on 05-02-2010 12:26 | Quote


Ireland during the boom was borrowing excessively via the private sector.
Ireland during the bust has been borrowing excessively via the public sector.

The Irish economy is in an inflated state. And we need to deflate in order to get out financially unsustainable situations. And we will need to deflate for the best part of the decade.

That means all of us. So far in Ireland everybody thinks that deflation is something that should be forced on somebody else. Prices of essentials like electricity in particular are way out of whack.

There will be no recovery until all the quangos are eliminated. They produce no wealth and function as semi-retirement homes for the politically well connected. Every political party is chasing the patronage of the state system. Getting rid of the quangos is an essential means of resolving this problem.

2010. I can see the minimum wage dropping by 50%, taxes going up, wages going down, unemployment going up, and prices going down. But the debt situation is still not resolving itself. And Debt will dominate the next decade.

What you have to say is important. Submit a comment*:

 
* All comments are moderated and posted live during working hours.